Every framework leads to the same number.

Pick the framework that governs you. The output is always a dollar-denominated risk position, not just a pass or fail.

Coverage

Six frameworks, one engine.

ISO 27001

Who it's for. Any organization building or maintaining an information security management system.

What you get. Framework-mapped assessment routed directly into your risk register.

NIST CSF 2.0

Who it's for. Organizations aligning to the US national cybersecurity framework.

What you get. Full function-by-function coverage, quantified.

CIS Controls v8.1

Who it's for. Organizations prioritizing a controls-first baseline.

What you get. Control-by-control assessment tied to dollarized impact.

SOC 2

Who it's for. Organizations proving trust-service-criteria readiness to enterprise customers.

What you get. Readiness assessment that doubles as your risk quantification input, built to move fast when a contract is on the line.

SWIFT CSCF

Who it's for. Financial institutions in the SWIFT network.

What you get. Full customer security controls framework coverage.

OT security

Who it's for. Organizations with operational technology or industrial control system exposure.

What you get. IT and OT exposure in one unified loss exceedance curve, not two separate reports.

Why one platform

Comparable across every framework you carry.

Regulated organizations rarely answer to just one framework. A financial institution might carry SOC 2 for enterprise customers and SWIFT CSCF for payment operations. An energy operator might carry ISO 27001 for the business and OT-specific controls for the grid. Saepium runs every framework through the same underlying engine, so the risk number stays comparable across frameworks instead of fragmenting into separate, incompatible scores.

Not sure which framework applies to you.

Talk to us about your framework